![]() |
Aviation of World War II |
![]() ![]() |
Soviet Union | Lend - Lease | Facts | Forum | Germany | Japan | R A F | U S A A F | Other | Photos | ||
| ||
I-16 type 4
On February 16, test pilot Kokkinaki began to fly on an airplane with an M-22 engine, on the same day the second plane with the "Wright-Cyclone" was tested by the test pilot Stepanchonok. We flew on skis, on February 25-27, both cars were handed over to the factory to eliminate the shortcomings and prepare for more thorough tests on a wheeled chassis. What did it become clear from the planes that flew for several hours? Both the I-16s with the M-22 and the Wright-Cyclone were similar in piloting, they easily switched from figure to figure, but did not allow sudden movements of the control stick. I had to be especially careful when landing, the plane did not allow high alignment. At the same time, the pilots noted that the I-16 was more stable during takeoff and landing than the I-14 fighter. And on bends, he was not so strict compared to his competitor. Of the two experienced I-16s, the machine with the M-22 engine inspired more confidence (the Wright-Cyclone caused unwanted vibrations on the second copy). The general opinion of all the pilots about the plane was quite dangerous, so the execution of figures, up to sharp turns, was prohibited on it for an indefinite period. The decision on serial production, however, remained in force, therefore, in the test approval act, Air Force Chief Alksnis ordered the selection of specially trained pilots for the new fighter, because the flight characteristics, and most importantly, the speed, were obtained very good during the ten-day tests. There were enough drawbacks, however, there was an unfinished fuel system, a flimsy flashlight, a weak sight mount, uncomfortable shoulder harnesses. Even then, the pilots noted the difficulty of boarding the plane and demanded the device of special stepladders or equipment for footboards. This shortcoming, which was subsequently noted by almost all pilots, was not eliminated, as is known. The mechanism for raising the OOS was very unreliable, often jammed and failed. Cleaning the landing gear was difficult even for such a physically strong pilot as Chkalov. |
|