Aviation of Word War II

Custom Search Russian

Tu-1 "63P"

Heavy Fighter Interceptor

Tupolev

Tu-1, second

Another bomber "103", which has the speed of a modern fighter, after the first stage of State tests was recommended for construction as a multipurpose aircraft capable of performing the tasks of both a bomber and a fighter, for which it was necessary to strengthen its cannon armament and armor protection. However, in the conditions of the outbreak of war with Germany, the absence of a significant number of long-range bombers in the Air Force on our front and the front's urgent need for a large number of cheap tactical combat aircraft, postponed the problem of designing a multipurpose heavy fighter based on the Tu-2 to a later date.

In May 1944, the OKB A.N. Tupolev GKO Decision No. 5947 dated 05.22.44 entrusted the construction of a high-speed day bomber "SDB" with two engines of the AM-39 type (aircraft "63"). On the basis of the bomber version, it was also envisaged to create a night fighter-interceptor.

In the version of the fighter, its forward small arms and cannon armament, consisting of two wing-mounted ShVAK-20 cannons, was enhanced by installing the following additional SPV options in the front of the bomb bay: two NR-45 cannons with 50 rounds per barrel; two NS-37 cannons with 50 rounds per barrel; two VYa-23 cannons with 50 rounds per barrel. The mass of a salvo of the front weapon was 752 kg/min for the variant with the NS-45 and 392 kg/min for the VYa-23. Protection of the rear hemisphere was to be carried out from two machine-gun mountings for UBT machine guns, caliber 12.7 mm. The upper installation had 250 rounds of ammunition, the lower one - 350 rounds.

The aircraft crew defended themselves from the fire of 12.7 mm machine guns. and shells of 20 mm guns. The pilot covered himself with an armored backrest and two 15 mm thick zalokotniki. From above, the armored back passed into a transparent armor plate with a thickness of 65 mm. The upper shooter was protected by a 12 mm thick plate, the lower shooter was protected by a 12 mm thick rear armor shield and a 6 mm thick lower cladding armor. When using the aircraft as a fighter, additional front armor for the pilot was envisaged, which consisted of a front armor plate 10 mm thick, a lower armored glass 65 mm thick, a front armored glass on a lamp 65 mm thick.

The aircraft's flight and navigation equipment was supposed to provide piloting day and night under any meteorological conditions. To unload the pilot from continuous monitoring of the temperature of water and oil in the engine cooling systems, electrical automatic devices were introduced to regulate the required temperature in these systems.

The most important component of the new fighter-interceptor was supposed to be a radar station. By 1944, the domestic radio engineering industry had achieved certain results in the creation of airborne aircraft radars. The Gneiss-2 station was put into serial production. In total, until December 1944, 231 copies of the Gneiss-2 and Gneiss-2M radars were produced - naval, for the aviation of the Navy, the radar could be used to determine sea and air targets.

The next step was the development of the Gneiss-5 onboard station. The station was intended for installation on two-seat fighters and was supposed to ensure the detection of enemy aircraft and guidance of their aircraft to them in the absence of visibility. In addition to aiming at the enemy aircraft, the station was supposed to provide the drive of its fighter to a special drive beacon from a distance of up to 90 km.

According to the opinion of the GK NII VVS Gneiss-5, in terms of its tactical and technical parameters, it was not inferior to the British airborne radar of a similar purpose, surpassing it in range. In the second half of 1945, a new station, designated Gneiss-5s, was put into mass production and put into service. The Gneiss-5M variant, which was adopted by the Navy in April 1945, was specially developed and put into production for the Navy.



Tu-1 Specification
Crew 3
Dimensions
Length, m 13.60
Wing span, m 18.86
Wing area, m² 48.80
Height, m 4.55
Weight, kg
Empty 9,460
Loaded weight 12,755
Gross weight 14,460
Powerplant
Engine 2 × PE AM-43V
Power, h.p. 2 × 1950
Performance
Maximum speed, km/h 641
Cruising speed, km/h 576
Rate of climb, m/min 435
Service range, km 2,250
Service ceiling, m 11,000

Armament. 2 × NS-23 in the wing, 2 × NS-45 in the nose, 2 × 12.7 UBT machine guns

On May 15, 1946, the preliminary design of the Tu-1 aircraft was ready. The ability to install powerful cannon armament, special radar equipment and, finally, the ability to increase the flight range, when installing outboard fuel tanks, up to 3000 km in combination with high flight speeds made it possible to use the Tu-1 as: an escort fighter armed with five NS-23 cannons; fighter-interceptor armed with two NS-23 cannons and two NS-45 cannons and equipped with Gneiss-5s radar equipment.

Note that the Tu-1 aircraft retained all its bomber armament and therefore could be used as a high-speed bomber, especially for topmast bombing when used in a marine theater of operations.

By the time the Tu-1 was tested (1947), the OKB gradually began to come to the conclusion that it was no longer possible to create a modern powerful complex for intercepting high-speed air targets, relying on the aging piston Tu-2. If at the end of the war the speed of the Tu-2 in the fighter version exceeded the speed of the main serial bombers, then with the appearance in the second half of the 40s of the first jet bombers, whose speeds approached 900-1000 km / h, the possibility of intercepting such targets by Tu-class aircraft -2 decreased sharply. It was necessary to transfer heavy fighter-interceptors to jet thrust and, as a result, increase their speeds by at least one and a half to two times.

Therefore, further work on interceptors of the Tu-1 type at the Design Bureau was discontinued. At the same time, the Design Bureau began to develop a promising concept of the required aircraft of this class, which is part of a single long-range interception complex.

Photo Description
Drawing Tu-1 (top view)

Drawing Tu-1 (top view)

Drawing Tu-1 (bottom view) Drawing Tu-1 (bottom view)

Bibliography

  • Tupolev Tu-2 bomber / Vladimir Rigmant. /
  • Tu-2 is the best bomber of the Great Patriotic War. / Nikolay Yakubovich /
  • History of aircraft structures in the USSR, 1938-1950. / V.B. Shavrov /