Aviation of World War II |
Soviet Union | Lend - Lease | Facts | Forum | Germany | Japan | R A F | U S A A F | Other | Photos |
Aircraft | Combat Use | Bell | Boeing | Brewster | Consolidated | Curtiss | Douglas | General Motors | Grumman | Lockheed Martin | North American | Northrop | Republic | Vought | People & Aircraft | Photos & Drawings | |
Disadvantages of the P-39 "Airacobra"Fighter Bell Airacobra Mk I from 19 GIAP, on which Major A.P. Zaitsev flew combat missions, spring 1942. The pilot died in this aircraft in a plane crash on May 30, 1942. One should not think that "Cobra" possessed only merit. In terms of speed, rate of climb, maneuverability, it was inferior to domestic fighters at low and medium altitudes. But this was not the main drawback of the American aircraft. Due to the fact that the engine was in the center of gravity of the aircraft, the Cobra reacted strongly to the center of gravity change. After the cannon shells were used up, the centering changed sharply and the fighter often fell into a tailspin. With a delay in taking out of the spin by only half a second, the R-39 went into an even more dangerous flat spin. It was enough carelessness on a deep bend or a combat turn, and the pilot, who pressed the pedal a little harder than usual, immediately fell into serious danger. The corkscrew on the Cobra was also uneven - there was a beating of the control stick with great physical exertion. In the report of the Air Force Research Institute on the testing of the P-39Q-10 aircraft (pilot K.I. Ovchinnikov), it is indicated: “Tug of the handle or the transfer of legs in aerobatics also leads to a spin. When centering is shifted back, the corkscrew tendency increases. " The most dangerous situation was when there was no ammunition on the plane, and the oil tank was filled under the neck. In relation to it, it was said: "It is very difficult to perform aerobatics on an airplane ... The slightest tug of the handle leads to a rapid drop in speed and a transition into a spin." The corkscrew has been the cause of numerous accidents and disasters in combat units. For two months in 1944, because of this, only in the 1st Guards Air Division there were two disasters and four accidents. In some places, at first, there was even a panic fear of performing aerobatics on the P-39 (for example, I.M. Dzusov talks about this in his memoirs). Moreover, not only hastily trained wartime pilots crashed, but also experienced test pilots. Only at the Air Force Research Institute there were three catastrophes: on February 2, 1943, K.A. Gruzdev died on the Aerocobra I, K.A. Avtonomov died on the P-39N on January 3, 1944, and K.A. Avtonomov died on April 27 of the same year on the P-39Q-10 - K.I. Ovchinnikov. The situation was so serious that in the fall of 1943 a special team of the Bell firm, headed by L. Rogers, who was in charge of the company for complaints, arrived in Moscow. It was not easy to jump out of the P-39, which got into a tailspin. They jumped into the left door, which was thrown off in an emergency. At the same time, a person often hit the stabilizer. The consequences of this could be fatal. Thus, Heroes of the Soviet Union N.M. Iskrin (in May 1943) and B.B. Glinka (in July 1944) were seriously injured. But even if the pilot was lucky and he got out of the spin, a new danger awaited him: due to large overloads, the tail unit of the R-39 was deformed, the rudders jammed. In March 1944, after a series of accidents and disasters, all Cobras were checked in the 11 Fighter Corps. On 15 machines, clear signs of deformation were revealed. The greater efficiency of the rudder could also lead to the fact that high values of g-forces could be obtained with sharp maneuvering. The result is the same, deformation of the tail and tail of the fuselage. Here are the lines from the report of the senior engineer of the 273rd division (September 1944): “Identified <…> twisting of the tail section of the fuselage in the radio hatch section during sharp evolutions in the air. There was a deformation of the skin in the lower end of the fuselage ... There was a case when in the air one of the halves of the stabilizer was bent towards the inner side. In the USSR, a whole program of combating the main defects of the "Airacobra" was carried out. After careful tests, the pilot's actions were revealed, provoking a spin. The Air Force Research Institute conducted a training session of instructors, in part they sent experienced pilots who demonstrated safe piloting techniques for an American fighter. They even filmed the training film "Corkscrew of the Air Cobra". All this significantly reduced the accident rate at the front, although, of course, it could not completely save from losses. By order of the Chief Engineer of the Air Force, restrictions were imposed on the alignment of the aircraft, it was forbidden to put covers and tools in the tail section when redeploying. Aerobatics without ammunition or ballast equal in weight was strictly prohibited. To shift the center of the fighter forward, it was sometimes practiced to remove the armor protection from the oil tank. They also began to strengthen the tail section of the P-39. It turned out that the safety margins of the Cobra were lower than those adopted in the USSR. In the design bureau of the Central Scientific and Operational Base (TsNEB) of the Air Force, engineer M.S. Malkov developed a technique for reinforcing the set in the tail section. The prototype aircraft was altered and tested at the Air Force Research Institute. Following this, the revision of the "Airacobr" was deployed directly in the shelves. In the air defense alone, 326 aircraft were converted in this way. In various parts, on their own initiative, other reinforcements were added to the fighter's glider. So, in the 273rd division, they put overlays on the stabilizer spars. |
Lend - Lease Lend-Lease | A 20 | B 17 | B 25C | B 25J | Mitchell in USSR | P 39 | P 40 | P 47 | P 63 | Hurricane Mk.2 | Hurricane in USSR | Spitfire Mk.5 | Spitfire Mk.9 | O-52 | PBN-1 | |